Lipson Neilson – Law Firm in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan

3910 Telegraph Road
Suite 200
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302

(248) 593-5000

(248) 593-5040

More Details

Lipson Neilson – Law Firm in Las Vegas, Nevada

9900 Covington Cross Drive
Suite 120
Las Vegas, NV 89144

(702) 382-1500

(702) 382-1512

More Details

Lipson Neilson – Law Firm in Phoenix, Arizona

5343 N. 16th Street
Suite 140
Phoenix, AZ 85016

(602) 626-8888

(602) 626-5588

More Details

Lipson Neilson – Law Office in Reno, Nevada

1 E. Liberty Street
Suite 600
Reno, NV 89501

(775) 420-1197


More Details

Lipson Neilson – Law Office in Colorado Springs, Colorado

102 S. Tejon Street
Suite 1100
Colorado Springs, CO 80903

(720) 601-8008


More Details


Or Search By:

Eric Tran


9900 Covington Cross Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89144


Practice Areas

  • Professional Liability
  • Business & Commercial Litigation

Eric Tran is an attorney at Lipson Neilson’s Las Vegas, Nevada office. Mr. Tran’s practice includes commercial litigation, personal injury, general liability defense, insurance coverage, insurance bad faith litigation, and professional liability.

As a litigator, Mr. Tran’s experience includes successful outcomes in cases at all levels of Nevada courts including the Supreme Court of Nevada. The following are summaries of a few of these cases:

2020 Case Summary
2019 Case Summary
2018 Case Summary
  • Fink v. Rands & South Ltd, et al. Obtained Summary Judgment on behalf of a law firm against Plaintiff’s Complaint on the basis that the law firm’s alleged malpractice was not the proximate cause of Plaintiff’s damages. Instead, there was an intervening judicial error that proximately caused Plaintiff’s damages. Read the Order here.
  • Zitch v. Stoffell. Obtained Summary Judgment ruling on behalf of law firm against Plaintiff’s Complaint on the basis of the absolute litigation privilege. Read the Order here.
2017 Case Summary
Other Represented Matters
  • Andrew v. Century Sur. Co., 134 F.Supp.3d 1249, 1252 (D. Nev. Sept. 28, 2015). Obtained summary judgment ruling that a $14,000,000 default judgment against an insured was a reasonably foreseeable consequential damage caused by an insurer’s breach of its duty to defend its insured; that an insurer who breaches its duty to defend its insured will be bound the default judgment against its insured; and that the insurer’s liability is not capped at the $1 million policy limit.
  • Brady, Vorwerck, Ryder & Caspino v. New Albertson’s Inc.,130 Nev. 632, 333 P.3d 229 (2014). Obtained a favorable ruling in a certified question of law that the statute of limitations in NRS 11.207, as revised by the Nevada Legislature in 1997, is tolled against an action for attorney malpractice, pending the outcome of underlying suit including all appeals in which the malpractice allegedly occurred.
  • USF Ins. Co. v. Smith’s Food and Drug Center, Inc.,921 F. Supp. 2d 1082 (D. Nev. Feb. 4, 2013). Obtained Summary Judgment in favor of Smith’s in a bad faith action arising from USF’s failure to defend and indemnify Smith’s in an underlying action from a third party.
Judicial Clerkships
  • Law Clerk to The Honorable Steve L. Dobrescu and Dan L. Papez at the State of Nevada District Court.
  • Judicial Extern to The Honorable Christina A. Snyder at the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
  • Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Tran served as corporate counsel for a startup technology company in Las Vegas.
  • Mr. Tran also previously served as a Deputy Attorney General for the State of Nevada defending state agencies and state employees in civil rights actions in both state and federal court.
  • English
  • Vietnamese
  • Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, J.D.
  • University of California, Los Angeles, B.A., Political Science and Asian American Studies
  • California
  • Nevada

We Look Forward To Connecting With You

  • Lipson Neilson P.C. publishes this website to convey general information and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. This Web site and its contents do not create an attorney-client or any other relationship between Lipson Neilson P.C. and any visitor to the Web site. Electronic mail (“e-mail”) sent to Lipson Neilson P.C. or any of its lawyers will not create an attorney-client relationship.
    * Checkbox Required
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

The verdicts and settlements listed on this site are intended to be representative of cases handled by Lipson Neilson. These listings are not a guarantee or prediction of the outcome of any other claims.